“Languid softness?” Are you kidding me?
Let me just say that I hate it when people in fashion make fluffy statements – like “relaxed glamour.” They’re cliché, insubstantial and reinforce the notion of fashion as a social enclave to non-fashion people because we throw around terms like “languid softness.” FYI: It’s nothing but empty jargon.
Another example – why not? On my way out of the Timo Weiland Fall 2010 show during New York Fashion Week, I overheard a fashionista commenting on the presentation: “I really liked the range of the collection; there were a lot of good separates, you know?”
No shit, Sherlock. Of course there would be separates. I could take the economic position by arguing that in today’s highly volatile market, not producing a range of clothing that would appeal to a wide demographic means retail suicide – especially if you are operating on high margins. However, the common sense in me (you know, the one that urks when I hear “languid softness”) says: “Of course they’re separates. What else would they be? Pants that are restricted to one specific top? Shoes that are incapable of being worn with, say, a different pair of jeans?
But I digress.
The opening of this blog entry was taken from Michael Kors’ Fall 2010 print-out. One of the strongest looks during the show was a knitted crossfox fling, smoke tissue cashmere pullover and camel suede trouser (pictured above). Did I mention this was worn by Frankie Rayder? Bonus. It was nice to see Michael cast some of the girls I grew up on – Frankie and Angela to be specific.
The outerwear for men was another highlight. Simon Nessman opened the Michael Kors Fall 2010 show in a camel crushed garbadine anorak (pictured below). Terron Wood (my new obsession) wore a tobacco distressed leather flight jacket and Max wore a leather cargo jacket.
